🔗 Share this article

An activist organization has stated to have harvested millions of songs from the popular streaming service and is preparing to release them publicly.

Possible Impetus for AI Development

Industry experts said the apparent leak could aid AI companies searching for material to train their technology.

An entity known as Anna’s Archive said it had scraped 86 million audio tracks from Spotify and 256 million entries of associated data such as performer and album names. Spotify, which hosts more than 100 million songs, confirmed that the leak did not represent its entire inventory.

“We have located and deactivated the malicious user accounts that engaged in unlawful scraping,” said a company spokesperson.

The Stockholm-based company, which has more than 700 million users worldwide, added that an investigation into unauthorized access identified a third party scraped public metadata and employed questionable tactics to circumvent DRM [digital rights management].

Group's Stated Goal and Concerns

Spotify does not believe the music taken by Anna’s Archive has been made public yet. Anna’s Archive, which is recognized for offering links to pirated books, said in a blog it wanted to create a ‘preservation archive’ for music.

They claimed the audio files accounted for 99.6% of all music listened to by its listeners and would be shared via ‘peer-to-peer networks’, a means of sharing large digital files online.

“Of course the service doesn’t have all the music in the world, but it’s a great start,” said Anna’s Archive, which describes its mission as “preserving humanity’s knowledge and culture”.

AI Training and Intellectual Property Battleground

A composer and campaigner for protecting artists’ copyright, said the breached music would likely be used for developing artificial intelligence systems.

“Educating models on pirated material is sadly widespread in the tech sector, so this stolen music is highly likely to end up instructing AI models,” he said.

The group's website alludes to a large online archive, a huge online repository of copyrighted books that has reportedly been leveraged by Meta to train its AI models.

The co-founder of an AI startup wrote on the professional network that members of the public could in principle “create their own private free equivalent of the service”. The executive added it could also enable tech companies to “train on contemporary music at a large volume”.

Copyright has emerged as a battleground between creatives, writers and content creators on one side and tech giants on the other.

Policy Proposals and Reactions

Across Britain, creative professionals have raised concerns against a government suggestion to let AI companies use copyright-protected work without permission unless the owner opts out. Virtually every respondent to a government call for evidence on the proposal has supported artists’ concerns.

A government minister for technology, research and technology told parliament this month there was “no clear consensus” on the issue, adding that ministers would “use the time to get this correct”. The administration has pledged to make regulatory plans on AI and copyright by March 2025.