🔗 Share this article

Australia's decisive policy to restrict social media access for young people below 16 is sparking debate worldwide. Officials, campaigners, and parents are monitoring with great interest to see if this strategy will become a template for the rest of the world.

European Movement

Across Europe, a increasing chorus of countries are moving toward comparable restrictions.

• Denmark has announced a prohibition on social media for youth below 15, with the leader stating that phones and platforms are "taking away our children's youth". The policy is expected to be enacted in the coming year.
• Norway is preparing to introduce a minimum age limit of 15, highlighting the need to protect young people from the "influence of the algorithms".
• Ireland is developing a digital wallet to confirm the age and identity of social media participants. Authorities have suggested that an Australian-model ban could be "a potential tools in reserve".
• In Spain, the prime minister has urged the legislature to approve a law raising the minimum age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has proposed a ban for under-15s, and a legislative committee has endorsed a related move, including an overnight "digital curfew" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The authorities in The Netherlands has recommended parents to restrict their kids from social media before 15.

For the broader EU, the bloc's legislature has passed a non-binding resolution calling for a ban for teenagers under 16 except if parental consent is provided. Although it warns of the "habit-forming" design of these platforms, the move does not create mandatory rules.

"An effective age barrier is a useful starting point," commented one parliamentarian behind the initiative.

The United Kingdom: An Evidence-Based Approach

In the UK, the government has kept open a potential ban, emphasizing that "no option is discarded" but stressing any action must be "grounded in conclusive data".

Last year, support grew behind a proposal to introduce limits on social media use by minors, but it was in the end watered down. However, the government pledged to investigate the matter.

Advocacy groups have expressed apprehensions. A prominent charity founded by the relatives of a young person who died after encountering disturbing social media material argues that a strict age ban may not protect children and could create a "dangerous transition" of risk when young people become eligible.

"Australia's ban is a response to the refusal of the Silicon Valley to design tools that are safe and age appropriate for children," commented a leading peer.

The US: A Decentralized Landscape

Across America, action is largely happening at the local government level against a backdrop of national inaction.

• Utah demands adult approval for minors to use social media and restricts late-night use.
• Florida has enacted a bill banning those below 14 from accessing social media, though it faces legal challenges.
• The state of Virginia has approved a rule limiting teenagers to a single hour of social media time per day, with additional use requiring adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise enacted bills mandating guardian approval for minors to create social media presences.

Despite cross-party agreement and suggestions from some figures to mimic Australia's example, a nationwide ban is currently seen as improbable.

Worldwide Views

Beyond Europe and the US, additional states are similarly taking action.

• Malaysia intends to prohibit social media for teenagers beginning next year.
• Brazil has raised the minimum age for Instagram to 16.

However, international organizations take a more cautious position. Unicef has cautioned that blanket prohibitions have downsides and "may even have unintended consequences". The body highlights that online platforms can be a "lifeline" for isolated children and that regulation should not be a "substitute" for tech companies to prioritize user protection.

While this worldwide debate continues, the actions of Australia and several other countries indicate that policymakers around the world are less and less content to wait for tech companies to act voluntarily.