🔗 Share this article

Each time a prominent awards ceremony nears, you'll find a clamor to include additional classifications to acknowledge unsung work and fill the passions of enthusiasts with niche passions.

A fellow writer previously argued supporting a scary games classification. It would be amazing. The same goes for tabletop games, which is a passionate advocate's mission. Yet I need to apologize in advance for pushing forward since similar to blinkered fanatics, I possess a compelling case for why my demand remains most pressing and significant. The demand is this: There should be a category for puzzle games.

Categorizing Game Types

Classifying creative works isn't exact; it remains highly personal, and typically spark debates and end in fuzzy definitions. There’s a reason film award organizations avoid this approach. However, it represents an essential concession for the industry of interactive entertainment, which are so diverse they barely qualify a single creative category.

To recognize the complete range of achievement in video games to receive acknowledgment, and for games of all stripes to receive proper recognition, specific award classifications remain vital.

Existing Game Classification System

Prominent interactive entertainment events offer these classifications covering Action-oriented games, Action/Adventure, Role-Playing, Combat games, Sim/Strategy, plus athletic and racing experiences. Between them, these award types effectively encompass a lot of ground, and you can find room for most games within them.

This doesn't apply to logic-based experiences. No suitable classification appears to put them. Consider three of outstanding current releases, each quite distinct: building puzzles from a specific release, fast-paced pattern recognition of another game, thought-provoking social scenarios from additional release. Where could they possibly go within current classifications? Unfortunately, nowhere.

Recognition Challenges

Numerous examples exist excellent brain-teasers published annually lacking appropriate categories in entertainment awards, if they accidentally match for categories like Handheld titles, VR/AR Game, or the extremely competitive small studio competitions.

• One classic puzzle game received no recognition completely in 2014
• A different innovative game was excluded during that ceremony
• Popular arranging title received no acknowledgment that year
• Limited numbers of puzzle games managed to sneak into small studio or handheld classifications

Value of Brain-Teasers

Commonly they're small games, yet the craft in brain-teasers holds tremendous importance. Famous handheld logic titles count as most popular titles worldwide and have been for an extended period.

The iconic tile-matching title rivals popular creative games claiming status as best-selling game of all time; it’s also in the running for top gaming experience. Logic titles represent cornerstones to the art of video games, while interacting with diverse game types.

Proposal and Rationale

Brain-teasers wouldn't encounter this problem. One could readily select a field of five with fascinating, diverse, deserving games every year with ease — actually, with challenge, because you’d have to leave many worthy titles.

To emphasize again, these include experiences without proper classification in important events. Puzzle game makers operate at the demanding boundary interactive creation, developing some of the purest expressions within interactive entertainment. Comparable to film action specialists, they deserve recognition. We shouldn't delay decades.